Re: Table partition: question

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:43:30 -0700
Message-ID: <1090302232.685335@yasure>

darkeagle wrote:

> Hi Morgan,
>

>>1. Why don't you believe the message?

>
> I believe the message! :-)
>
>

>>2. What do you think you will accomlish by hashing a substring?

>
> The string is a concatenation of more information. I want to partition by a
> substring because the hash have to work only on one information hold by the
> string.
>
> Gaetano
>

You have a first class violation of relational theory if your string is a concatenation: Parse it.

Daniel Morgan Received on Tue Jul 20 2004 - 00:43:30 CDT