Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: oracle - mysql comparison
Karl Schendel wrote:
> In article <cZ%Jc.94793$a24.93839_at_attbi_s03>,
> "Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net> wrote:
>
>
>>"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message >>news:1090027361.387590_at_yasure... >> >>> >>>michael newport wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Jon, >>>> >>>>check out www.ca.com for Ingres, its the same strength as Oracle but >>>>will shortly be OpenSource. >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Michael Newport >>> >>>And by 'strength' you mean? >>> >>>Daniel Morgan >>> >> >>I think he means it is good at locking. It has a strong locking mechanism. >>Last time I used Ingress (quite a few years ago) an insert into a table >>would lock the whole table! Why? It had page level locks and inserting a >>record into a table with a primary key locks the entire index which means >>only 1 person at a time could insert records. You had to commit to release >>the locks. So don't have long running transactions. Leads to bad >>programming practices; developers putting the system into autocommit mode. >>(yeach)
Well based on the number of licenses for Ingres, as a database rather than embedded into another application, I wouldn't expect there are very many people that need to remember how to spell it. Sort like remembering how to spell Paradox, dBase, RBase, Advanced Revelations, etc.
I take it you criticized Jim's spelling because as we all well know ... the problem he pointed out exists ... something even you acknowleded.
Daniel Morgan Received on Sat Jul 17 2004 - 19:15:40 CDT
![]() |
![]() |