Re: Why?

From: <omlet_at_omlet.org>
Date: 29 Jun 2004 16:25:00 -0700
Message-ID: <dc6c1ff0.0406291525.6761b0ca@posting.google.com>

Mladen Gogala <gogala_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.06.28.23.30.07.194580_at_sbcglobal.net>...
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:40:16 -0700, omlet wrote:
>
> > HJR, you are really dumb!
> >
> > Oracle data scenters use Network Appliance filers that are basically
> > built with RAID4 technology - similar to RAID5.
>
> We are not talking about data scenters and anything else connected with
> scent. The fact that you've just discovered deodorant and its use is only
> of mild interest for this forum, because scents do not propagate through
> the Internet. Your mom may be much more interested in your scenters. As
> for NetApp, I work for a company that uses it, and NetApp is configurable.

What? I guess you do not know your ass from your ears. NetApp is hard wired RAID4 with large cache and requires a lot of cash. I agree that the "I" is misleading somewhat. Actually, many blocks gets written over and over -- so writing a full track at once pays off! You are getting 10K nfs ops from two shelves; that is great!

Now the scenters you talked about are the trademark of your mother. I know made a ref to that to paint the gogala gomala.

gogala-less. Received on Tue Jun 29 2004 - 18:25:00 CDT