Re: Windows ASM and DBCA in 10g

From: Chris <christian.antognini_at_trivadis.com>
Date: 29 Jun 2004 06:41:17 -0700
Message-ID: <c283720b.0406290541.2089f6a2@posting.google.com>

Hi Howard

> INSTANCE_NAME
> ----------------
> +asm

Must be "+ASM" not "+asm". I just tested it on my linux laptop.

> Can I ask where you heard about the naming issue, so I can read around on
> the topic? It certainly sounds like a plausible candidate for the cause of
> my woes, and perhaps there's only a couple of other things I need to change
> to get it working!!

The information comes from a 2-days seminar about 10g that has been written from some colleagues and I (I work for Trivadis, a company specialized in consulting and training). In fact, when a new release comes, we spend some month testing the new features and documenting not only how it should work but also how it really works! With ASM we noticed that when the instance is not called +ASM some tools, like DBCA, don't recognize it.

Chris Received on Tue Jun 29 2004 - 08:41:17 CDT