Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: tough choices

Re: tough choices

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:36:09 -0700
Message-ID: <1088055397.21570@yasure>


Mark Townsend wrote:

> Noons wrote:
>

>>
>> But the partitioning being extra is new in Enterprise Server 10g.
>> That has always been the argument for that version: it has everything
>> and the kitchen sink, except for weird and wonderful options such as
>> cluster server stuff (aka RAC), OLAP, text.
>>

>
> Noons - I'm confused. Partitioning has always been a chargeable option,
> from when it was introduced way back in Oracle 8. Are we at
> cross-purposes here ?
>

Interestingly enough while it is a "chargeable option" I am currently consulting for a division of a very very large aerospace firm, and I am aware of a very very large internet retailer, that do not pay a premium for partitioning. I can partition every database in the entire corporation and not one additional cent goes to Larry.

Once again ... it all comes down to negotiations. I am beginning to think that too many geeks need to take some bonehead business classes.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Thu Jun 24 2004 - 00:36:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US