Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: tough choices

Re: tough choices

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:31:13 +0100
Message-ID: <40d342f9$0$290$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>


thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
"Ian" <ianbjor_at_mobileaudio.com> wrote in message
news:40d337d9$1_1_at_corp.newsgroups.com...

> Niall Litchfield wrote:
>
> > "Mark A" <nobody_at_switchboard.net> wrote in message
> > news:Za5Ac.101$ln4.34863_at_news.uswest.net...
> >>
> >>Where does he say that federated support will be used (or is needed) for
> >>DB2?
> >
> >
> > I got that from
> >
> >
> > "DB2 can deliver better performance but *only if* the data that is
> > accessed together is physically laid out together and the application
> > has knowledge of the physical data layout (so it can connect to the
> > right node in the cluster )."
> >
> > I may of course be wrong.
> >
> >
>
> In this case, he is most likely referring to collocation when you're
> using DPF, which will make a big difference in query performance.
> This has nothing to do with federation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Received on Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:31:13 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US