Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: database market share 2003
Here dickhead, read and weep:
IBM Keeps the Crown -- DBMS Market Share Results for 2003
For 2003, IBM is once again the new license revenue market share leader for the DBMS software market, says Gartner Dataquest in their May 2004 analyses. Overall new license DBMS sales for the industry increased 5.5%, from $8.3 billion (U.S.) to $8.8 billion, while overall RDBMS sales increased 5.1%, from $6.7 billion to $7.1 billion, compared to a 7.2% DBMS market decline in 2002. Dataquest attributes this growth to the elimination of excess capacity purchased in 2000 and 2001, investment in data warehouse and strategic business intelligence initiatives, and currency conversion benefits. Dataquest sees a "return to normalcy for the mature DBMS market" with market growth expected in the "mid-single digits through 2008." Learn more at the website.
http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?on=IMNL604B43
This is not nearly as important as understanding that DB2 runs the same code base across all platforms and that Larry Ellison uses SQL-Server on all the Oracle web sites. SQL-Server by the way runs the same code base on alll platforms too. Oracle is dead, it's over for the big red one, less than half what DB2 did in the market. Oracle is old school, over and done.
"Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:40d180bb$0$12961$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> Data Goob apparently said,on my timestamp of 17/06/2004 9:14 PM:
>
> > I was going to try to come up with some poetry of my own,
> > but I'm not as good at it as you are.
>
> Please, spare us all....
>
>
> > The point is Nano-Nano that DB2 runs the same code base
>
> The point is two-dicks: you don't have a clue.
>
>
> > across all platforms, as well as SQL-Server, and I believe
> > even Informix.
>
> Absolutely. Care to talk about computers instead of shoes?
>
>
> > I thought we covered this.
>
> You covered nothing. Stop deluding yourself.
>
> > strange is why you felt compelled to take personal shots at
> > just about everyone who has been in this conversation. It
>
> It's not strange. It's the obvious consequence
> when an idiot tries to use personal attacks on me.
>
> > is also strange why Oracle doesn't run well on mainframes,
>
> Who cares about mainframes?
>
> > and cannot scale their clustering beyond 8 servers, which
>
> Bull.
>
> > by the way is documented in Oracles' own literature.
>
> Bull.
>
>
> > Even
> > Larry Ellison uses SQL-Server on all the Oracle web sites,
>
> What a pile of crap. Get over the personal attacks, it might
> work in the Microslop groups you frequent but doesn't stick
> with professionals.
>
> > so I don't understand the vitriole coming from you.
>
> Rest.
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:15:14 CDT