Re: Which column caused ORA-01438?

From: Paul Brewer <nothing_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:24:26 +0100
Message-ID: <40ce00c6_1@mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com>

"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1086154514.727990_at_yasure...
<snip>
> There is absolutely no excuse for a table with 303 columns.
<snip>

I don't disagree, but unfortunately some of us have to work with Peoplesoft.

Regards,
Paul Received on Mon Jun 14 2004 - 14:24:26 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Brewer: "Re: which column type char,varchar2 is better for index?"
Previous message: Alan: "Re: which column type char,varchar2 is better for index?"
In reply to: Daniel Morgan: "Re: Which column caused ORA-01438?"
Next in thread: Noons: "Re: Which column caused ORA-01438?"
Reply: Noons: "Re: Which column caused ORA-01438?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US