Re: database market share 2003

From: Larry <Larry_at_nospam.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:38:46 GMT
Message-ID: <qxDxc.1506$IO.1139010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>

And I suppose that Oracle has no cross to bear in this area?

Larry Edelstein

Daniel Morgan wrote:
> Serge Rielau wrote:
>

>> Noons wrote:
>>
>>> What was stated here many times by IBM people was that the
>>> code base was the same.  Unqualified.  Period.  Whereas
>>> Oracle's wasn't.  About as much sense as the rest of
>>> IBM's policies...
>>
>>
>> Noons, can you point us to a google-link where this claim was made. 
>> I'm following these newsgroups since about 6 years and I have never 
>> seen such a claim.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Serge

>
>
> I just went to google and put in the following as my seach criterion:
>
> "DB2" AND "Single code base"
>
> You might want to do the same.
>
> The first link returned was:
> www-1.ibm.com/....
> Top of the next page was:
> www.db2mag.com/ story/....
> And Oracle ... at otn.oracle.com has White Papers
> detailing where that claim has been made.
>
> I think the claim has been made numerous times. And like so much
> marketing hyperbole is one that would best be apologized for.
Received on Wed Jun 09 2004 - 07:38:46 CDT