Re: How about an Oracle debate?

From: Richard Foote <richard.foote_at_tbigpond.nospam.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:58:16 GMT
Message-ID: <YBjxc.404$uB3.232@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

"Dusan Bolek" <pagesflames_at_usa.net> wrote in message news:1e8276d6.0406080551.2eb8d122_at_posting.google.com...
> don_at_burleson.cc (Don Burleson) wrote in message
news:<998d28f7.0406070529.2594aaf3_at_posting.google.com>...
>
> <proposal snipped, anyone here knows what we are talking about>
>
> I do not think that any truth can came out of TV style debate. It
> would be too shallow, too personal, full of unsubstantiated claims. It
> is going to look like:
>
> HJR: Your index knowledge is crap.
> DB: It isn't.
> HJR: In your article published in ... on ... you stated that ... and
> that's simply not true.
> DB: According to MY NUMBERS from MY TESTING, this is how indexes in
> Oracle are working.
> HJR: According to MY NUMBERS from MY TESTING, this is utterly crap.
> DB: It isn't.
> HJR: It is.
> DB: It isn't.
> HJR: It is. Your test is ill-founded because of ...
> DB: It isn't, your test is ill-founded because of ...
> SPEAKER: Ok, we have to pause this one hour online debate for two
> weeks, because we need to replay mentioned tests of both sides.
>

Hi Dusan,

Exactly, I wouldn't be able to get a bloody word in ....

Cheers ;)

Richard Received on Tue Jun 08 2004 - 08:58:16 CDT