Re: Oracle 10g Server on Windows XP Pro

From: Jeff <jeff_at_work.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:25:50 GMT
Message-ID: <c9kh0e$dmq$1@cronkite.cc.uga.edu>

In article <40bcf07b$0$31675$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>, "Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote:

>> They imply one thing, at least: that the 10g database has not yet
>> been shown to be fully sorted out for use with Oracle's own
>> application server, although it is "certified."
>
>Yes, but it is ever thus. When "9iAS" first came out, it didn't work with
>the 9i database, IIRC, but only 8.1.7.

9iASr2 used the 9ir1 database... seems they are always (and purposely) a step behind with the database.

>better in the latest version, I haven't checked). 9iAS first release was
>awful. Second release was getting there. But it is obviously, er, shall we
>say 'immature', and I would never say that about the rdbms. So I don't know

Hmmm. I'd say 9iASr2 was still pretty awful from my experiences with it. Received on Wed Jun 02 2004 - 07:25:50 CDT