Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Article about supposed "murky" future for Oracle
Serge Rielau wrote:
> Joel Garry wrote:
>
>> You really think the MSSQL locking and consistency is acceptable for >> nearly all enterprises? Maybe I missed something, but it seems to >> foment lots of strange ideas about those subjects, and I don't mean >> just from the O point of view (in fact I think the "rdb way" is most >> "correct" and O is a bit oddball, but I've become convinced the "O >> way" is generally better for business apps - don't know much about DB2 >> besides what I see here).
Much of the core functionality of Oracle is dependent upon the versioning. Microsoft is attempting to duplicate it to put an end to their inability to complete with everything from RAC on down. At it most basic level ... it is impossible for SQL Server to produce a result set consistent to a point-in-time. Which explains to many, especially those inside Microsoft, why they are running their corporate financials on SAP with Oracle. A huge embarrasement for Ballmer & Co.
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:20:41 CST