Re: MS SQL Server Evaluation

Howard J. Rogers wrote:

> Were you aware that Larry pulled the entire RAC course material about 4
> weeks before it was due to be delivered... because it kept saying things
> like "RAC is an enhancement to... a development of... OPS". Larry pulled it
> because he wanted RAC pushed as a brand new product with no forebears, which
> is what the revised notes went on to do.

I am aware of this.

> Sounds like you bought the company line, sorry to say.

Unless the developers, themselves, are lying after being plyed with a substantial quantity of mind-altering liquid I'm inclined to believe them.

> Unless you can show me the source code for OPS and the source code for RAC,
> then weird hints that "I have good reasons for stating something" don't
> actually get us anywhere. Particularly when I can equally mysteriously add
> that I have extremely excellent reasons for stating that I know RAC is a
> development of OPS.
>
> HJR
We both know I don't have the source code and that anyone that has it and does so is toast. So I expect we'll have to let this one end where it is.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)