Re: Multiplexing redologs - is there still need for it?

From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:44:22 +0100
Message-ID: <9bp550l9beu037h7bnbf8ca5sv1fkok469@4ax.com>

On 13 Mar 2004 01:27:40 -0800, pagesflames_at_usa.net (Dusan Bolek) wrote:

>Well, that's possible, but If you have DG in place,
>you should be protected against this (primary fails, but secondary got
>all transactions right).

I don't think that is true. Even if you define dataguard to ship transactions, the shipment will take place after the online log of the primary database has been written. So that's not going to help you.

I'm not sure why people want to contest sensible guidelines.

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

Received on Sat Mar 13 2004 - 04:44:22 CST