Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Morgan's Problem D'Jour

Re: Morgan's Problem D'Jour

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:15:11 -0000
Message-ID: <4051a9cf$0$3310$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1079074731.936177_at_yasure...
> Daniel Morgan wrote:
> > Brian Peasland wrote:
> >
> > If no one has any more ... it is time to open a TAR and let someone
> > inside Oracle sweat this one.
>
> Here's the response from Oracle's documentation people. And it indicates
> the problem is a bit wider than I found. (Names removed to protect the
> innocent).
>
> > Hi F........ The COMMENT statement got two additions for the
> > extensible indexing project of the 9.1 > release: COMMENT ANY
> > INDEXTYPE and COMMENT ANY OPERATOR. In theory, two corresponding
> > privileges were added as well.
> >
> > My tests show that the privileges were not added, and I get the same
> > result as Dan on the COMMENT ANY OPERATOR statement. I think we have
> > some code bugs here, as well as some doc that possibly has to change.
> >
> > I'll find out who is responsible for the extensible indexing material
> > these days and follow up.
>
> So there you have it ... don't try to COMMENT anything other than tables
> and columns.

wasn't it you that remarked on monsters that actually commented things <g,d&r>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
Received on Fri Mar 12 2004 - 06:15:11 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US