Re: Advanced queueing question

From: Tim Kearsley <tim.kearsley_at_milton-keynes.gov.uk>
Date: 10 Mar 2004 04:00:26 -0800
Message-ID: <725736ef.0403100400.4cf7e6f@posting.google.com>

OK Daniel, fair comment.

Having now read up a bit on AQ, the wait events are very likely referring to the queue being in an idle state and waiting for messages to be enqueued and therefore don't represent user sessions waiting (which was my concern).

Once again thank you for your help.

Regards,

Tim Kearsley

Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1078844914.709094_at_yasure>...
> Tim Kearsley wrote:
>
> > Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1078779398.273955_at_yasure>...
> >
> >
> >>Advanced Queueing is excellent and can handle very high transaction
> >>volumes. The same can not necessarily be said for your vendors
> >>implementation.
> >>
> >>For a full demo on AQ to better learn it go to:
> >>http://www.psoug.org/reference/library.html and look up DBMS_AQ
> >>and DBMS_AQADM.
> >
> >
> > Daniel and Sybrand,
> >
> > Thanks very much to both of you for your response. Daniel, I will
> > follow that link and see what I can learn.
> >
> > Do the stats I published suggest abnormal waits to you, or is there
> > insufficient context to be able to comment?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim.
>
> Insufficient information.
Received on Wed Mar 10 2004 - 06:00:26 CST