Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Materialized View vs. Manual summary job

Re: Materialized View vs. Manual summary job

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_exxesolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:43:47 -0700
Message-ID: <3F4F74B3.B81B66AD@exxesolutions.com>


Comments interspersed.

Christian Svensson wrote:

> Greetings all,
>
> We are currently in our Datawarehouse project using manual jobs to
> create summay tables for our datamarts. I am about to investigate if
> we can gain some performance of using Materialized Views(MV) to do the
> summary tables so to say. The datamarts affected by this are always
> inital load and not delta loads. The jobs are run every weekend.
>
> - Are there any performance gains using MVs to handle the summary
> tables creation versus to manual in a Sql job do the summary ?

Yes. I'd suggest you investigate materialized views at http://asktom.oracle.com

>
> - When new daily data arrives in our fact table, does the MVs refresh
> engine only do a new summary of only the newly arrived data or does it
> do a complete refresh ? (The anwser to this is directly affected the
> above...)

Depends on how you define your materialized views: There are many different refresh options. Investigate this further at http://tahiti.oracle.com

>
> Our environment is Solaris & Oracle 8.1.7.3

Patch to 8.1.7.4.

>
> Thanks for any comments on this.
>
> Best regards
>
> Christian Svensson

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/extinfo/certprog/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/extinfo/certprog/aoa/aoa_main.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Fri Aug 29 2003 - 10:43:47 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US