Re: why five (blocks)?

From: Tanel Poder <change_to_my_first_name_at_integrid.info>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:29:19 +0300
Message-ID: <3f4a7faf$1_1@news.estpak.ee>

> > one header block + 4 data blocks
> >
> > (So it would make sense for the first extent only)

Yep, 4 is definitely more acceptable number (at least a power of two :) but I still don't think that "header + 4" was the reason for putting the five as minimum extent size, because most of the data belongs to tables consisting of more than five blocks anyway...

I'll ask from metalink and let you know if they answer...

Tanel. Received on Mon Aug 25 2003 - 16:29:19 CDT