Re: can't store oracle Database in NAS based on linux?

what does stand for IMO?

thanks a lot.

"Brian Peasland" <dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com> wrote in message news:3F326AF7.6631F4DE_at_remove_spam.peasland.com...
> People have put Oracle databases on NAS, but IMO, it is not a good idea.
> Oracle likes to keep in touch with the datafiles that make up the
> database on a pretty regular basis. I've seen where network glitches or
> hiccups present problems if the Oracle datafiles are on NAS. And this
> can cause the database to crash. So I won't use NAS for Oracle. SAN or
> direct attached disk is much better.
>
> HTH,
> Brian
>
> somez72 wrote:
> >
> > hello.
> > NAS based on linux ( using samba (CIFS service ) or NFS ) can't
store
> > oracle Database? is it right?
> > I'd like know some reason why NAS is not good for saving oracle
> > Database?
> >
> > but, I heard NAS can store MS-SQL data base? is it right?
> >
> > thank you.
>
> --
> ===================================================================
>
> Brian Peasland
> dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com
>
> Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.
>
>
> "I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
> the three"
Received on Thu Aug 07 2003 - 20:29:16 CDT