Re: sequence and OPS

From: quarkman <quarkman_at_myrealbox.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 07:01:37 +1000
Message-ID: <oprs8vczbfzkogxn@haydn>

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:59:53 +0100, Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Quarkman,
>
> are you saying that creating an ordered cachd sequence causes the
> ordered bit to be ignored ONLY IN AN OPS environment ?
>
> I don't use OPS, but all our sequences are ordered and cached (and
> pinned) and we have no problems whatsoever.
>
> Cheers,
> Norm.
>

Sorry for any possible confusion: yes, the ignoring of ORDERED happens only in a RAC/OPS environment.

~QM Received on Fri Aug 01 2003 - 16:01:37 CDT