Re: Orbitz blames Oracle for site outage

Keith <nospam_at_nospam.com> wrote in message news:<vhcj9d8s6q6vef_at_news.supernews.com>...
> Can any complex system crafted by fallable humans, eg. Oracle RDBMS,
> Boeing 747 etc, be with certainty be called "unbreakable?" When Oracle
> says that it is "unbreakable", does it mean it will never crash or be
> "cracked" by hackers?
>
> Keith wrote:
>
> > Sir, the post was on topic. Freedom of speech is a central tenet of the
> > internet. Perhaps you should apply for a job with A.G. John Ashcroft.
> >
> > The story underscores false advertisement of sorts. To say a product is
> > 'unbreakable', as complex as it is, is in my opinion, irresponsible.
> >

Your opinion has been clearly stated with each derrogatory post you make to this newsgroup. You have absolutely no working knowledge of Oracle, yet you persist in badmouthing the product. Why is this? Are you paid by Postgres to plant seeds of doubt in the minds of Oracle users in hopes these same users will become disgruntled with a robust product that far outperforms Postgresql and jump ship? Or are you simply a troublemaker, not happy unless you've instigated some fracas over something you know little or nothing about?

Take your vitriolic verbiage elsewhere, "Keith". It is not welcome here.

David Fitzjarrell Received on Thu Jul 17 2003 - 10:44:41 CDT