Re: [ANNOUNCE] Senora: a replacement for sqlplus

From: Howard J. Rogers <howardjr20002_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:24:29 +1000
Message-ID: <7QHka.10039$1s1.167275@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

"Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote in message news:3e933754$0$22004$cc9e4d1f_at_news.dial.pipex.com...
> You will note that I didn't object to the original post since there was
only
> one of it and it was well worded. What I don't buy is "I don't charge
> therefore my ads come under different rules - and hey look there is a
> technical definition of spam which I don't meet so na na na na " or
similar
> justifications.
>
> can I come off the group grumpy pills yet ?
>

Agree entirely. In the past four days or so, I have had the line "I don't charge for access to my site's materials, so I thought it was OK to host your copyrighted material" on a couple of occasions now. Lack of charging doesn't mean the thing is public domain, and I'm getting a bit grumpy myself hearing how free should mean free-for-all.

By the way, I think there was a "na" missing in your penultimate sentence.

;-)
HJR Received on Tue Apr 08 2003 - 17:24:29 CDT