Re: Finding full-table scans?

From: Howard J. Rogers <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:22:15 +1000
Message-ID: <S0Mja.7967$1s1.129216@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

"Rob" <Robins_at_ka.net> wrote in message
news:42cc4cfc.0304051758.1a310d5a_at_posting.google.com...
> I usually don't feel the need to rebuke messages here, but I can't
> help it this time. Is the man's script above inaccurate or flawed?

No. Miraculously, he got it right this time.

> Looks to me like it's something people on this board can use as is or
> modify to fit their needs. In other words, it's something of worth
> and demonstrates what boards like this are all about: DBA's helping
> DBA's. Your message helps no one and serves no purpose.

The advice is: be warned about Burleson, because his advice is frequently technically complete gibberish. That's this DBA helping all DBAs out there. Like all advice from any source, you don't have to take it.

>And where's
> your actual answer to the original question and script that helps the
> one who posted?

My advice as just described is indeed of possible assistance to the one who posted.

HJR Received on Sat Apr 05 2003 - 20:22:15 CST