Re: sql tuning

Howard,

I really do wish you would stop beating around the bush and tell us what you really feel...:)

Mike
"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:<AGvl9.42059$g9.121498_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com>...
> "Karen Abgarian" <abvk_at_ureach.com> wrote in message
> news:3D940A9C.D0D55052_at_ureach.com...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I sense a shovel load of 'horse manure' on it's way o:)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nah, only when excrement of another kind is posted first. Which you
> never
> > > do.
> > > (Though references to a certain "pop singer" come close!!)
> > >
> > > ;-)
> >
> > For the sake of completeness, here is this excrement:
>
> You said it.
>
> > > I do not think that it really suffers. The effects should decrease with
> the
> number
> > > of extents in your rollback segment. If there is too many there is
> always a
> question
> > > whether they were sized correctly. There should be no impact if the
> tablespace
> > > hosting your rollback segments is an LMT.
> >
>
> LMT minimises the problem. They don't eliminate it. As you yourself finally
> admitted. And whether LMTs' minimization is sufficient for all databases in
> all circumstances is highly debateable.
>
> > Not to discourage others who dare to post to the forum when you are around
> ....
> >
>
> Since I've made around 4000 posts here over the past 3 years, and you've
> made about 30 fairly vacuous ones in the past 3 weeks, I think it evident
> that I don't discourage anyone who has anything meaningful to say (or ask)
> from posting here (after three years, this place would be dead if what you
> say were true).
>
> What I do ask of you is that you firm up your 'thoughts' and 'feelings' and
> switch to cold, hard facts.
>
> Less of the subjunctive mood ("There should") and rather more of the
> conditional tense ("There would").
>
> > :-)
> >
>
> Smiley faces don't make up for a lack of basic understanding or concrete
> knowledge. I don't know you from Adam (or Eve), and accordingly I couldn't
> particularly give a damn one way or another about you, the person. I am sure
> you are nice, pleasant and a hoot at parties. I confidently expect that you
> can cook a juicy Christmas turkey whilst juggling spinning plates and
> chainsaws. I am even fairly confident that you know, basically, your way
> around Oracle. When, however, you insist on posting random thoughts here as
> though they were worthy of factual merit, I will call you on it every time.
>
> I am sorry if you think me unpleasant whilst doing so. I can assure you that
> I am 10 times more good looking that Richard Foote, and at least as pleasant
> as a rhum truffle on a salacious evening's saucy entertainment. But there
> are enough myths out there already without me readily accepting additions to
> the list.
>
> HJR
>
> >
Received on Sun Sep 29 2002 - 12:00:44 CDT