Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: optimal size for rollback
Niall Litchfield wrote:
> "Igor Laletin" <ilaletin_at_usa.net> wrote in message
> news:f9226414.0209222310.54d00258_at_posting.google.com...
> > Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
> news:<3d8dc82d$0$22173$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
> > > 22 Sep 2002 04:23:35 -0700, Igor Laletin said (and I quote):
> > >
> > > PMFJI
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I absolutely agree with you. Just such applications are rare. They may
> > > > exist in a training course but don't survive in production environment
> > > > for long.
> > >
> > > I'm going away on holidays soon, so I can't go into this like it
> > > deserves. Let me just say this: after using Oracle since 1986, I have
> > > yet to see out there a "properly designed" application that doesn't
> > > exhibit one or more of the symptoms Howard and Karen talk about.
> >
> > There is no "more". We're talking about just one particular symptom -
> > an application allows user to start a transaction and go for a lunch.
> >
> > So most of the application you worked with since 1986 do that? Bad
> > luck.
>
>
The solution to this is separate profiles for different classes of users. Anyone that has power over hiring, firing, and budgets usually gets whatever they want.
Of course after being apparised of the risks and agreeing to accept them.
Daniel Morgan Received on Mon Sep 23 2002 - 10:51:56 CDT
![]() |
![]() |