Re: 9iAS Version 9.0.2.0.1 OC4J and OPMN Problems

I think that's a bogus answer... as long as you install to a separate Oracle home, it should be fine if you've got the system resources to spare. You probably should shut the 8i instance down during installation, as it might consume resources the install needs. But once installed, I doubt having the 8i instance running alongside 9iAS matters if, as I said, you've got enough system resources to accomodate both.

In article <17b90aca.0209042252.603b5eff_at_posting.google.com>, augenstern4u_at_yahoo.de (Karin) wrote:
>unknown <nobody_at_blackhole.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:<pan.2002.09.04.18.11.14.600765.1817_at_blackhole.nospam.com>...
>> On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 15:11:56 +0200, Karin wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all together,
>> > We just installed the newest version of 9iAS. The installation didn't
>> > cause problems. Everything looks to be okay. But when the configuration
>> > assistant started we got problems. The configuration assistant for the
>> > OC4J instance and the OPMN failed. It said, that 6 of 7 processes could
>> > only be started. During this configuration the /var/tmp directory
>> > increased heavily. We decided to go on with the SDK installation,
>> > because we thought, that we could configure these two components later.
>> > But that was not the case. So we rebooted the server and tried to
>> > startup everything manual using a startup guide from Oracle. But we
>> > cannot get the d... thing up again. Does anybody had similar problems?
>> > If yes, could you fixed them and how? We are using HP/UX 11.0 on an
>> > A-Class server. Thanks for all help. Cheers,
>> > Karin
>>
>> I have seen that, albeit on Linux. Invariably, on Linux this meant that I
>> had failed to comply with all the required prerequisite steps (kernel
>> parms, binutils, etc.).
>>
>> Are you using the new, patched version or the old version when you had to
>> patch the infrastructure database youself?
>
>
>We are using the newest version, where the patches are included. I
>also opened a thread in Metalink. There I got told, that there should
>be no other Oracle products on the server. On our server there is an
>Oracle 8.1.7 Database..... :-(
>
>Cheers,
>Karin
Received on Thu Sep 05 2002 - 07:18:11 CDT