cache vs keep buffer pool

From: Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:16:48 +0100
Message-ID: <E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA7029744C0@lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk>

Niall,

speaking as a Highlander (and there can be only one !) the true meaning of the word 'Sassenach' (I'd love to hear that pronounced in foreign climes !) is 'Lowlander'. and not necessarily 'Englander' - so don't feel too bad about it :o)

Actually, talking of pronounciation, Laphroaig is another good one :o)

Cheers,
Norman.

---

Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk

Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Niall Litchfield [mailto:niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com] Posted At: Monday, September 02, 2002 2:10 PM Posted To: server
Conversation: cache vs keep buffer pool
Subject: Re: cache vs keep buffer pool

"Connor McDonald" <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3D6FD9B0.7DEB_at_yahoo.com...
>
> Oh dear oh dear...
>
> For peaty mastery, you can't go past a cask strength Laphroaig or a 20
> year old Glenlivet.

You have a point :). Blame it on the soft sassenach. Received on Mon Sep 02 2002 - 10:16:48 CDT