Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Odd statement in docs regarding block size

Re: Odd statement in docs regarding block size

From: dbuckingham <member_at_dbforums.com>
Date: 29 May 2002 06:14:21 GMT
Message-ID: <3cf471bd$1@usenetgateway.com> 





HJR comments that in NT/2000 he always sets the DB_BLOCK_SIZE to be 16k
and others back that it should be either the same as or a multiple of
the os_block_size. In NT/2000 I believe that the default is 8k, so is
there a real need to set them at 16k?



Basically I am after some clarification as to how I should set them in
NT/2000 for currently we have them set to 8k and i want to know if this
is optimal?



Any comments.




--
Daniel Buckingham
Technical Consultant
Mercia Software

Posted via dBforums
http://dbforums.com


Received on Wed May 29 2002 - 01:14:21 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US