Personally - I think IAS9i is the biggest piece crap ever thrown together -
however this is just my personal opinion as administrator. However, I've
done my share of Java programming in the past - If you want to go with java
on the middle tier - download the JDK/JRE from Sun / use JDBC or SQLJ for
Oracle connections and some Corba towards the clients ... in other words -
write you're own Application with your favorite texteditor (well maybe for
the GUI stuff you could use JBuilder - but that's it) - it can't get worse
than IAS9i
Maybe you should have a look at what else is on the market ... (Bea ?)
"S ICM" <S.ICM_at_icn.siemens.de> wrote in message
news:3BDEBA17.EAA8DDDB_at_icn.siemens.de...
> Hi ,
> I am interested in java features:
>
> I have two Oracle branches:
>
> The old approach:
> Features:
> 9i EE DB + RAC = Cluster
> JVM with native compilation
> (Do we have load-balancing on this VM?)
> JMS + AQ
> EJB, Corba, Servlets and Apache (J2EE)
> JNDI
> Dynamic Services
> PL/SQL(do we have load-balancing here?)
>
> The new approch
> Features:
> OC4J Framework 9iAS
> J2EE Stack Cluster ( :-) )
> All possible J2EE components
> as above listed
> Dynamic Services (B2B)
>
> Which branch of the tree will dry out and
> fell down?
>
> They (some oracle guys) say it will be
> the old approach.
> http://technet.oracle.com/tech/java/java_db/content.html
>
> If they do it; I think at the end
> the PL/SQL will move to the J2EE (OC4J) stack.
>
> What will happen with Oracle???
>
> :-)
> Volker.
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 31 2001 - 14:04:39 CST
