Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle goes ballistic
Thanks, will take a look. The overhead problem was one thing we were
worried about if we were to start tracing etc!
Incidentally, the process which uses the CPU is called oraclelims ( our database is called lims). Looking at the system today we have three of these running so I will check out the changes when the runaway occurs.
We have very few users, 512 meg of ram 1 gig swap and plenty of free disk space. The system is running smoothly apart from this odd glitch.
Thanks again
WB
Trust me to get a darn tigger in the thread!
Ricky Sanchez <rsanchez_at_more.net> wrote in message
news:3BC5F6CF.BCB2D85C_at_more.net...
> Install Statspack and run snaps at perhaps five minute intervals until
> you capture the "slow" period. You can get the 8.1.6 version of
> Statspack and retrofit it to 8.0.x with an included script to create a
> view of the multiple buffer pools. Put Statspack in its own tablespace,
> or a tools tablespace with its own disk so you don't induce contention
> while running snapshots. Statspack has otherwise insignificant overhead.
>
> Also, get concurrent sar reports for that same period to make sure the
> box and operating system are healthy enough. Make sure you get memory,
> cpu and I/O info from sar for that period.
>
> You can use cron to kick off the snaps and the sar, which makes it easy
> to synchronize the two and to turn them back off again. Once you are
> past this issue, 1/2 hour snaps on an ongoing basis are excellent for
> continuing monitoring, but for diagnostics use the shorter interval to
> "zoom" in on the problem.
>
> Do five minute snaps until you have the problem period covered, then run
> a report for that five or ten minute period to see exactly what is going
> on. If you don't know how to interpret the thing, post it here and I
> will take a look at it, as will others. You can also upload it to the
> Oraperf site if it is running that day.
>
> - ricky
Received on Thu Oct 11 2001 - 16:09:06 CDT
![]() |
![]() |