Re: Any way to get seq.currval without using nextval?

From: Kevin Brand <kevin.brandx_at_tel.gte.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:37:04 -0500
Message-ID: <9pskj8$3t0$1@news.gte.com>

Would this not be a little skewed if SEQUENCE_CACHE_ENTRIES is non-zero?

-Kevin

"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3bc1a5ac.8712764_at_news...
> On 8 Oct 2001 05:44:33 -0700, gwhubert_at_hotmail.com (Gene Hubert)
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Is there any way around this or am I forever vexed?
> >
>
> Have you tried a select from ALL_SEQUENCES, or USER_SEQUENCES?
>
>
>
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Received on Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:37:04 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ron Reidy: "Re: Can't create DB"
Previous message: Chuck Hamilton: "Re: penis enlargement"
In reply to: Nuno Souto: "Re: Any way to get seq.currval without using nextval?"
Next in thread: Nuno Souto: "Re: Any way to get seq.currval without using nextval?"
Reply: Nuno Souto: "Re: Any way to get seq.currval without using nextval?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US