Re: Oracle 9i first impressions.

From: George Barbour <george.barbour_at_gecm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:03:28 +0100
Message-ID: <3b4962f4$1@pull.gecm.com>

I knew it (internal) was going, I just lament its loss. I kinda liked it. I didn't mean that much by my post, certainly didn't want to start folks arguing.
I am by the way really impressed by O9i, and OEM9i is awesome.

George Barbour.

"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message news:3b47e0e5_at_news.iprimus.com.au...
>
> "Ux" <dontsendmemail_at_bogusmailaddress.com> wrote in message
> news:lVI17.8430$Fy3.741812_at_bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > This has been posted *numerous* times to this group.
> >
> > So???
> >
> > Old newsgroup messages get cleaned and not everyobody is able to read
> > *every* message posted here day in and day out.
> >
>
>
> True enough ...but I think the real point being made was that posters here
> should familiarise themselves with the Google Usenet archive... a great
> source of old info that can be searched relatively painlessly.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 09 2001 - 03:03:28 CDT