Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: performance with many columns

Re: performance with many columns

From: <michael_bialik_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:53:24 GMT
Message-ID: <854nk0$k6t$1@nnrp1.deja.com>


Hi.

 Are you using array processing or you are fetching single row each  time?

 Michael.

In article <947193957.11941.0.pluto.d4ee154e_at_news.demon.nl>,   "Sybrand Bakker" <postmaster_at_sybrandb.nospam.demon.nl> wrote:
> You provide very few clues to be able to resolve the problem
> Various things can go wrong
> - the physical organisation of that table. If you never changed the
> block_size from 2048 and your recordlength is indeed 1000 (which is
probably
> the maximum) you are storing one record block and you are likely to
incur
> row-chaining. Analyze the suspected tables, report back the
block_size, the
> average record length and the number of rows chained. Probably this
is a
> substantial figure.
> - are you conducting a full table scan
> - if yes how large is your buffer cache
> - what is the value of db_file_multiblock_read_count
>
> As you see I'm not yet ready too believe without any further info your
> system is 'configured well'. This might be the case with that server,
but it
> is a known fact the Oracle defaults where made up somewhere in the
late
> '70s, early '80s, they never changed since and in most cases way too
small
> nowadays. Too often sites complaining about performance problems are
still
> using those defaults, and unjustifiedly blaming Oracle.
>
> Hth,
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
> Bart News <bartb_at_allinson-ross.com> wrote in message
> news:v37d4.1053$S64.35011_at_nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> > I am having serious performance problems with Oracle when using
batch
> > programs (PRO*C or PRO*COBOL), that need to travers (read from
> > top to bottom) fairly wide tables, i.e.
> > tables with around 200 columns (table is about 1000 characters
wide).
> >
> > I have plenty memory(1 GB), a fast, 8 CPU, UW7 machine, RAID disk,
but
> > compared to reading the same file in C-ISAM mode, performance is
more
> than
> > 7 to 10 times slower. As far as I can tell, my system is
configured well.
> >
> > Using Oracle 8 too, which allows up to 1024 columns.
> >
> > Any suggestions, pointers to papers ?
> >
> > Bart Blom
> >
> >
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Fri Jan 07 2000 - 06:53:24 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US