Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Y2K issues
In article <387200AF.FC129818_at_Unforgettable.com>,
Kenneth C Stahl <BlueSax_at_Unforgettable.com> wrote:
> Paul Bennett wrote:
> >
> > [this is not directed to anyone in this thread]
> >
> > Why are people so stupid?
> >
> > Managers are now talking about how y2k was hyped up, and it wasn't a
big
> > disaster like everyone thought, and how they spent to much money on
a problem
> > that wasn't bigger.
> >
> > Um, try to follow me now Mr. Managers. This is a tough one. If you
had not
> > spent the money, it would have been a bigger problem.
> >
> > -- Paul
>
> Agreed. All of the work corrected things that should have been
corrected a
> long time ago - the Y2K thing just got everone off their duffs to
track
> down all of the different problems.
>
Well, I'm sure we are all dead keen for the Y2K development/deployment freeze to end, but the truth is that it's not quite over yet: Y2K isn't quite over yet.
After we get through Thursday, we should be through the grosser symptoms of Y2K - the rest of them may take weeks or months to manifest and require some really intense 'down and dirty' post-mortems on transactions and event logs to correct.
E
--
Projects Department
http://www.bluebaysoft.com
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 07:34:27 CST
![]() |
![]() |