Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Performance of Oracle on read-intensive operations
What should be performance of Oracle on read-intensive operations
vs the performance of copy (UNX cp) command?
For example, I have a table with 5 mln. records, each record is approx 100
bytes.
I do SELECT without any WHERE, ORDER BY, GROUP BY, or anything like that.
I run this SELECT in SQL*Plus with all options (like LINESIZE, PAGESIZE,
etc)
set appropriately. SQL*Plus creates spool size 0.5 GB This operation takes
20 min
on the box with very light load (all CPUs are 70% idle).
At the same time, to copy a 0.5GB file between filesystems only takes 2 min.
Is it normal? Is it because Oracle needs to manipulate blocks in the buffer
cache
(write dirty blocks / free space for news blocks)? Or these is some other
reason?
Thanks,
Sev
Received on Mon Sep 20 1999 - 01:20:39 CDT
![]() |
![]() |