Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Help:NT faster UNIX?
The big question on everyones mind:
What's the HARDWARE????
If you have a Dual Pentium II system with 512MB RAM running NT, and an old HP chip with 8MB ram, than the OS is not the problem.
Given equal hardware, UNIX (HP-UX not being the best) out-performs NT 90% of the time for equivalent tasks.
For a RDBMS the harddrives and RAM would be the most important things.
A new EIDE hardrive averages around 16MB transfer bursts, with Ultra ATA running slightly faster with better sustained rates.
SCSI-I/II is 10MB, Fast SCSI-II/III is 20MB and UltraWide SCSI-III is 40MB, which means anything below UltraWide will be the same or slower. SCSI performs better with Multi-tasking/processing OS's than EIDE becuase of the dedicated I/O processor.
On Mon, 16 Feb 1998 21:41:56 +0100, Carsten Wiemann
<carsten.wiemann_at_technet.net> wrote:
>I made several oracle instalations on WindowsNT and Unixcomputer (Sinix,
>HP-UX). If I made an import (dump) on WindowsNT-servers, there I needed
>15-20 minutes. On Unix I need 40-60 minutes for the same import. But
>later, if I ran the application, there I have the same problem...unix is
>2-3 times slower then NT.
>What is the solution. I can't accept this, because I think that Unix has
>to be faster then NT.
>
>Please help
>
>Carsten Wiemann
>Hattingen
>Germany
>
>
-- -- Keith Moore President KMA Computer Solutions, Inc. -- /*----C/C++--Java--VB--Pro*C--SQL--OCI--Java--Delphi--ODBC--COBOL-----* * When the project must be saved at all costs: * * KMA Computer Solutions, Inc. Project Troubleshooting/Recovery * *---------Linux---AIX---HPUX---SYSV---Novell---NT---OS/2---'95-------*/Received on Tue Feb 17 1998 - 00:00:00 CST
![]() |
![]() |