Re: Performance of Oracle Workgroup on NT

In article <3329cd55.3209535_at_news.icm.edu.pl>, Pawel Pietrusinski <pp_at_ciop.waw.pl> wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Mar 1997 07:18:34 PST, Eric Liu <eliu_at_unix.infoserve.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>If you are using OWG on NT, are you satisfied with its performance? Are
>>you willing to share your experiences? Judging from the DejaNews search
>>on the articles, it looks like MS SQL Server and Sybase on NT have much
>>better performance on NT.
>>
>>I also read that OWG may have memory leaks on NT, is that true? Any
>>feedback is appreciated.
>
>Yes, I've tried to use OWG on NT 4.0 and its performance
>is very poor especially, on inserts and updates.
>SQL Server and SQL Anywhere were about 20 times faster
>( I run an update query on a 16K row table).
>
>When I asked Oracle what they thought of it they suggested I'd get
>a service contract or they won't answer.
>
>Very classy indeed.

Whaddaya want fer nuthin', rrrrrrrrrrrrubber biscuits?

>
>Regards,
>Pawel Pietrusinski
>
>

-- 
These opinions are my own and not necessarily those of Information Quest
jgarry@eiq.com                           http://www.informationquest.com
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/joel_garry
"See your DBA?"  I AM the @#%*& DBA!