Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Ambiguous column names in subselects - how resolve?
tOn Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:12:58 +0200, "Shakespeare" <whatsin_at_xs4all.nl>
wrote:
>
>"Brian Tkatch" <N/A> schreef in bericht
>news:ii30f39i87ogt1l535duct00uu6uhe93rc_at_4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:58:31 -0700, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Brian Tkatch wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:03:29 -0700, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Brian Tkatch wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:08:04 +0200, "Shakespeare" <whatsin_at_xs4all.nl>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> <SNIP on topic stuff>
>>>>>>> As said by others: using * in a query is a bad idea. Using * to
>>>>>>> *shout* in
>>>>>>> your post is even worse..... if you expect serious answers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shakespeare
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> *ahem*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Netiquette Guidelines" <URL:http://rfc.net/fyi0028.html> in section
>>>>>> "2.1.1 For mail:", paragraph 17:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Use symbols for emphasis. That *is* what I meant. Use
>>>>>> underscores for underlining. _War and Peace_ is my favorite
>>>>>> book.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's paragraph 16 that decries SHOUTING:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Use mixed case. UPPER CASE LOOKS AS IF YOU'RE SHOUTING.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, using asterisks to shout is abnormal, to the point where noone
>>>>>> would care anyway. Using it for emphasis, is recommended. But who am i
>>>>>> to tell the bard... :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.
>>>>> One aspect of communication that must be accepted is that when you are
>>>>> in your parent's house ... you follow your parent's rules.
>>>>>
>>>>> When in c.d.o.misc you observe the group's standards. When in alt.test.
>>>>> you don't.
>>>>
>>>> And here i thought i gave the "standard" answer.... :)
>>>>
>>>> B.
>>>
>>>Not sure you didn't. I just wanted to point out that in most usenet
>>>groups spamming is permitted by the charter. In this one it is not.
>>>Each group is a community unto itself with its own standards.
>>
>> Spamming? Perhaps i missed the point here. I thought we were talking
>> about emphasis via asterisks.
>>
>> B.
>
>Okay, sorry, I was *mistaken* here! Did not mean to start a complete new
>discussion here.....
>SORRY FOR THAT!
>Still, when someone uses *too* much *emphasis* it may start to *look* like
>he's actually shouting.....
>And I still think it's not the cleverest way to react on anwsers on one's
>posts. Netiquette or not...
>
>
>Shamespeare.
>
Heh. That makes sense. :)
B. Received on Wed Sep 19 2007 - 08:37:18 CDT
![]() |
![]() |