DA Morgan wrote:
> Bricklen wrote:
>> <snip>
>> Wasn't he referring to Sybrand, not Howard?
>
>
> Not according to my memory which, I will sadly acknowledge, is
> sometimes faulty. It has certainly been my experience that Sybrand will
> say something and be done with it whereas Howard will continue to post
> when no point remains to be made other than having the last word. It is
> sadly one reason why I now routinely stop responding to what he writes:
> Once it degenerates into a testosterone contest I lose interest.
If you doubt your memory, you could have gone back and checked the
thread -- it was only a day or so old (from Google if you're really keen).
I might add, my point was not intended to produce a denigration of
Howard, it was simply to correct your attribution of Adrian's comments.
Received on Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:45:48 CST
