Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: The reserved word "ACCESS" in a field list of a PL SQL Query

Re: The reserved word "ACCESS" in a field list of a PL SQL Query

From: Turkbear <john.g_at_dot.spamfree.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:31:32 -0500
Message-ID: <cta3k0hnpnrab6h4829v6um6b48s7d2drd@4ax.com>


Hans Forbrich <forbrich_at_yahoo.net> wrote:

>Turkbear wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually I was taught that a table has records which have fields and
>> that they only are called rows and columns because of the way they are
>> most often displayed, since they obviously are not arranged that way in
>> the database.
>>
>>
>> Tuples, anyone? ;-)
>
>My preference is for tuple/attribute for ER design, table/column for
>Relational implemetation & web page, record/field for forms & structure.
>
>Reason for tab/col - when I want to see a definition I look at DBA_TABLES
>and DBA_TAB_COLUMNS views provided by Oracle. (PErhaps you interrogate
>DBA_RECORDS?)
>
>WRT the post, I have seen the term 'field' mapped to 'form' rather too
>often. These days, when I hear a person grumble about things like field
>names in SELECT statements, I tend to think they've spent too much time
>with tools related to VB and Access - and then I think of the associated
>difficulties in explaining Oracle concepts to that person.
>
>However, I'll not quibble.
>
>/Hans

Extremely good point about the DBA_TABLES,etc views..... ( It is interesting to note, however, that ROWNUM ( not RECNUM) is used to count the returned   records from a query...)

I'll not quibble either.. (tried it once, didn't like it ;-) )

John Received on Fri Sep 10 2004 - 08:31:32 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US