Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Embedded SQL vs Stored Procedures
Sybrand Bakker wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:08:24 +0100, Gama Franco <gama_franco_at_clix.pt>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Unfortunatelly I really have to.
Hi,
Ok, here it goes.
I'm programing a database based on a temporal extension to the
relational model. That means that I need to simulate the DBMS, and every
table created by the user will be a temporal table (dealing with time
intervals). The database will have tables to manage all the meta info,
and temporal tables will be created on demand (just like the way that
you create a table when you need in Oracle, but these one are temporal).
This means that the program will need to manage and create new tables,
and OCCI is a major requirement. It's CERN's official programming
language...
Because the system will be used by a large number of scientists, there
will be no DBA. To manage all this chaos, an hierarchical model will
handle the location of the tables (we simulate something like a file
system on the top of the hierarchical model, and every table will be
located at a leaf of the tree).
This is just a brief introduction, and I would like to know if someone already made the performance tests on Embedded SQL vs Stored Procedures. If this is not the case, I will have to make the tests but I was looking for a shortcut.
I'm not crazy or stupid. This system is already running using MySQL (I now what you're going to say) as the repository. It is already collecting data and the database is somewhat big. We need to create an implementation in Oracle and make some performance tests. If you have a lot of scientist running their own experiments with specific use cases, you need to figure out a clever way to give them freedom without throwing them into chaos.
Best regards,
Gama Franco Received on Tue Sep 07 2004 - 17:33:25 CDT
![]() |
![]() |