Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: timestamp problems
There is also an undocumented
alter ... compile timestamp '...';
which can be used to avoid timestamp issues on an adhoc basis
hth
connor
"Mark D Powell" <mark.powell_at_eds.com> wrote in message
news:178d2795.0111270702.409b1f91_at_posting.google.com...
> "Sabine.Buechel" <Sabine.Buechel_at_innosystec.de> wrote in message
news:<9ttot3$sfc$01$1_at_news.t-online.com>...
> > Hallo,
> > need your help!
> > As developer I need a recreation of my database (simple by using a
script),
> > where the complete db with its packages will be drop first, than
recreated
> > afterwards.
> > My proplem is now, that timestamp problems appear, that means in my
FORMS
> > Application Message (see afterwards) appear.
> > What can I do to prevent a recompilation of my executable or packages?
> >
> > Dears
> > S.Buechel
> >
> >
> > Exception in FORMS is:
> >
> > ORA-04062:signature of package "xxx" has been changed
> >
> > Description from the ORACLE DOCUMENTATION:
> >
> > ORA-04062 "string" of "string" has been changed
> > Cause: Attempt to execute a stored procedure to serve an RPC stub which
> > specifies a timestamp or signature that is different from the current
> > timestamp/signature of the procedure.
> > Action: Recompile the caller in order to pick up the new timestamp.
>
> I remember hitting a problem like this and found the following in my
> init.ora
> # added 03/08/2001 mdp chg from timestamp due to forms 6 using plsql
> 2.2
> remote_dependencies_mode = signature
>
> By using this parameter then as long as the procedure parameter list
> matches in number and type Oracle should act like the procedure has
> not been changed.
>
> -- Mark D Powell --
Received on Tue Nov 27 2001 - 15:28:04 CST
![]() |
![]() |