Re: Huge problem with COM+ performace? PART TWO

From: Michael D. Long <michael_d_long_at_bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:15:56 -0500
Message-ID: <uS4reH8YBHA.1920@tkmsftngp02>

VB is perfectly adequate for 98% of all n-tier projects, unless it is placed in the hands of the incompetent. In fact, it is easier and more efficient to produce MTS (COM+) objects in VB than in either VC++ or Delphi.

For the other 2% of the cases (where you truly need pooled objects) VC++ is the better choice.

He'd be better off paying someone to perform a code review and cleanup than wasting time on a technique that would require re-implementing the objects.

Michael D. Long

"Alexander Rodygin" <Rodygin_A_at_mirantis.ru> wrote in message news:#wzo#nuYBHA.1436_at_tkmsftngp04...
> Hi.
>
> If what you said about awaiting of object is true then I'd try to create
an
> empty object with ATL that match your object's settings and see if the
story
> continues.
> Simply put I do not trust VB when it cames to distributed computing.
Received on Fri Nov 02 2001 - 11:15:56 CST