Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: NO_DATA_FOUND exception workaround in functions?
Or you could use:
select min(emp_name) into v_emp_name from emp where emp_no = v_emp_no;
to force the DB return at least one row and then check for null
if v_emp_name is null then
michael_bialik_at_my-deja.com wrote:
> Hi.
> Use cursor instead of single select :
> declare
> cursor emp_crs ( pi number ) is
> select * from emp where emp_id = pi;
> begin
> open emp_crs(121212);
> fetch emp_crs into emp_rec;
> if emp_crs%notfound then
> ...
> end if;
> close emp_crs;
> end;
> Michael.
> In article <7rohsh$lh7$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
> adil_at_msil.sps.mot.com wrote:
>> Hello, >> >> I have a function which, among other things, performs a query. This >> query sometimes returns no data (depending on the given arguments). >> Apparently, when this happens, a "NO_DATA_FOUND" exception is quietly >> thrown, and the function abruptly ends at this point. I'd rather this >> didn't happen, because I wish to continue even if the query returns no >> data. I could wrap each such query with in its own block, so that I >> could catch the exception right after the query, but that would be
>> cumbersome and could complicate my code significantly. I could also >> precede each select with another select to bring back the number of
>> the upcoming select will produce, but that's even more cumbersome. >> >> Does anyone have a more elegant solution to this problem? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Adi. >> >> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ >> Share what you know. Learn what you don't. >>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
-- - Have several nice days... - Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of the Corp.http://www.ntfaq.com
![]() |
![]() |