Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Interface
We are doing something fairly similar and decided upon a product called
DataMirror.
Ours was a little more involved in that we had to keep both in sync, while
changes and
additions are done on both ends.
It handles everything. It seemed to be the simplest approach.
Rui Anastácio <coreto03_at_axa-seguros.pt> wrote in message
news:7qdk1q$ej6$1_at_duke.telepac.pt...
> Hi !
>
> I'm working in interface between machines. I have to pass data from more
> then 30 tables relative to some entity from oracle to IBM Mainframe each
> time some new entity is added or changed.
> I could write triggers on insert and on update to control these
situations.
> Each time the trigger is activated I could mark the record as changed. But
> its a large number or tables so I'm using a different aproach.
>
> At the end of the day I will select * from the master table and build a
text
> file (600 bytes per record) with all the entity information, even if no
> changes where produced (a mirror of the data). The problem is that this
file
> is big: more then 15 Mb.
>
> Since 95% of the data has no changes and it's old it's a lost of time to
> process it, I'm thinking about a auxiliary table to hold this data and a
> method to determine wich data to pass, something like:
>
> set all record of auxiliary table as "deleted" (if not found in master
> table means it was deleted)
>
> fetch master table entity record
> fetch all other entity data
> form the complete record to export
> goto auxiliary table and see if complete record exists:
> if it doesn't then insert it and mark as "to transfer" (new)
> if it does and it's different then mark it as "to transfer"
(changed)
> if it exists and its equal then mark as "not to pass" (exists but no
> change)
>
> ----
> The first time I will pass all data to the file and the auxiliary table.
> From that point on only the not equal to "not to pass" will be saved to
the
> export file and processed by the IBM Mainframe.
>
> I wold like to know about your opinion, suggestions, comments,
improvments.
> Is there a better way to solve this kind of problems ?
>
> Regards
> Rui Anastácio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 02 1999 - 10:46:57 CDT
![]() |
![]() |