Re: Good ISQL

From: Chris Weiss <weisschr_at_pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 10:45:03 -0400
Message-ID: <7nppeb$d03$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>

SQL-Station has some pretty serious memore limitations they have never overcome. If you have extremely large packages, SQL Station simply bombs.

Christopher Weiss
Professional Services Division
Compuware Corporate

R. Nightingale <nighr_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7nl795$6up$4_at_hyperion.nitco.com...
> This is kind of Apples and Oranges.
>
> TOAD is a no-nonsense rapid application tool that's very handy in
generating
> simple SQL objects. For most simple projects it can't be beat for the
> price.
>
> SQL-Station is a heavy-duty, multi-user tool. The heart of it comes from
> Platinum's SQL-Coder. It is now supported by the full might of Computer
> Associates. It features a repository approach of reuseable objects from
one
> project to the next. The last time I used it, it also supported
SQL-Server
> as well as Oracle.
>
> It's been two years since I've used the SQL-Station product. Platinum had
a
> pretty liberal "try before you buy" policy.
>
> --rvn.
>
> Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote in message
> news:7njkrb$bdb$1_at_imsp009a.netvigator.com...
> > Which tool is better: TOAD or SQL-Station?
> >
> > --
> > ===================================
> > http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/
>
>
Received on Thu Jul 29 1999 - 09:45:03 CDT