Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

From: Thomas Kyte <tkyte_at_us.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:04:03 GMT
Message-ID: <37aa37ce.21854665@newshost.us.oracle.com>


A copy of this was sent to "Jorge" <cafelito_at_---NO---SPAM---yahoo.com> (if that email address didn't require changing) On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:19:15 +0100, you wrote:

>>>consider but they know this. We don't like using the data-dictionary
>hack.
>>
>>don't do the dd hack. use a view. renaming a column has many
>ramifications.
>
>What is the data-dictionary hack? and how...
>What can fail if we do it?
>
>thanx
> Jorge
>

he is talking about updating the data dictionary tables directly and then shutting down and starting up to 'rename' a column.

terrible idea, bad idea. use a view.

--
See http://govt.us.oracle.com/~tkyte/ for my columns 'Digging-in to Oracle8i'... Current article is "Part I of V, Autonomous Transactions" updated June 21'st  

Thomas Kyte                   tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
Oracle Service Industries     Reston, VA   USA

Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle Corporation Received on Wed Jul 28 1999 - 12:04:03 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US