Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Pro*C or OCI, which is faster?

Re: Pro*C or OCI, which is faster?

From: Steve Haynes <steve_at_rwx777.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:49:09 +0100
Message-ID: <SxZtAAAVrxS3EwF9@rwx777.demon.co.uk>


In article <3748F7A8.A5532E69_at_mail.com>, Andrew Babb <andrewb_at_mail.com> writes
>James,
>
>I am not sure about the different versions of Pro*C, but OCI is faster than
>Pro*C. Not sure how much by, but this is something that Oracle states due to
>the fact that the call interface is at a lower level with OCI.
>
>Rgds
>Andrew
>

I suspect the difference is not significant when compared to maintanance. oci 7 and 8 are way different, but pro*c is pro*c. I have only used oci when I needed arrays of cursors and pro*c didn't support it.
Steve
--
Please remove nospam from my address to Reply. Received on Tue May 25 1999 - 16:49:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US