Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: PeopleTools vs. std. Oracle
Although some of that is BS , a large part is true...If you do not maintain
changes to the database , especially storage and extent changes, the next
time you use peopletools to do any kind of db miantenance you will not carry
foward those changes...A perfect example is extents...Delivered the max
extents is something criminal like 121 and the next extent sizes are like
8k...well, this really isn't even funny...If you change these via normal
means and then use peopletools to , lets say, rebuild your indexes, you loose
all of the extent changes...It really depends on what your departments are
being asked to support...If its just DB you can get by with a good audit
trail of doc...If its DB and System administration you should get your
management to get you a tools class...Marty
In article <6s10s1$r6t$1_at_client3.news.psi.net>,
"Jerry Gitomer" <jgitomer_at_ictgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gee, I wonder how I used to create databases, tablespaces, tables, etc.
> back in the good old days (Oracle 4.x) before they came out with whiz-bang
> handy-dandy tools like PeopleSoft.
>
> Okay, it may be easier for developers accustomed to PeopleSoft to use
> their tools than to learn something about the database they are using. I
> find it discouraging that they don't want to learn more about the RDBMS,
> including how it works and how to work with it.
>
> I do most of my Oracle administration from the command line. For my
> developers I have downloaded T.O.A.D. from www.toadsoft.com (or is it
> www.toadware.com?) It is a great tool and it is freeware.
>
> regards
>
> Jerry
>
> Rye1 wrote in message <35E37B11.B02F3012_at_netunlimited.spamnyetnet>...
> >We are blessed with some PeopleSoft implementors who have told their
> >manager that "all Oracle administration must be done with PeopleTools"
> >including adding of data files, changing extent specs, adding
> >tablespaces, etc. Not knowing a lot about PeopleSoft, this claim seems
> >to have a high BS content as PeopleSoft should not care about data
> >files, etc. What I'm looking for is battle experience with this type
> >of setup to verify / reject the "need" for doing everything in
> >PeopleTools.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum Received on Wed Aug 26 1998 - 14:13:26 CDT
![]() |
![]() |