Re: Backup/Cloning Marketing (was PureStorage for some reason)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:30:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sY=7pcAQdFRNw6cP71YuTMW72EGLL2uRTYmOcbMNfjQjQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
Mladen
I personally mentioned Actifio and Oracle SnapClone, at least the second of these was mentioned by others. I didn't mention existing backup solutions like commvault and NetApp SnapManager which was certainly an omission, but in my experience, these solutions usually require a degree of scripting and/or database and storage knowledge. The emerging database virtualisation tools take some, probably most, of that away.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/23/2016 06:38 PM, Tim Gorman wrote:
>
>> But attempting to control the conversation by labeling responses with
>> which you disagree as "marketing" (or any other pejorative) is nonsense.
>> We've all got eyes and brains and can decide that for ourselves. If you
>> disagree, then rebut with facts, not opinions. Each person on the list can
>> decide what is right, wrong, or drivel.
>>
>
> Hi Tim,
> How many other tools were mentioned on this group, as a possible cloning
> solution? How many times was Delphix mentioned during the last few months?
> I am not attempting to control anything, I am just warning the readers of
> this group about the marketing. There is a simple truth: there are other
> solutions for cloning databases, which deserve some mention, with different
> strengths and weaknesses. Yet, for some reason, only Delphix is regularly
> offered as a cloning solution on this group.
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> http://mgogala.freehostia.com
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.orawin.info -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Apr 25 2016 - 11:30:53 CEST